RV Notes; notes with Dor

A few misc. items relating to RV/psi, and a meditation (ok just sitting around) with the (late... the Four removed him from me/us) internal thoughtform Dor.


Journal Fragment, February 25, 1998

I heard one of my outer guides! I could never hear them before! OK so it's probably 'me' but I could never even hear myself-as-them before.

He said... "Go to the plane that is right at heart level." The one that I was using awhile ago to sense something... I forget what. I visualize it like a flat sheet of light that connects to the bottom of my chest, sorta.

He said... something like, "That is where the real RV data can be {found/acquired}."

I had been planning to do an archmed on RV in a little while but he answered my question I guess!


Journal Fragment, Date Unknown

RV Haiku

we seek evidence
for the coincidence of
our matching data


Journal Fragment, November 10, 2004

Last night while relaxing I had the feel that a man 'sat down inside me' like a ghost or psychic. I thought, well perhaps I'm imagining this.

But then I realized that I had completely quit breathing in response, and surely my body wouldn't spontaneously react so strongly if there was nothing to it.


Journal Fragment, May 17, 2005

I had this dream. This is like 'abstracted through 7 levels' to get to words, so it sounds like one trite thing on the surface, yet was something... so much fuller in the experience. A female identity 'inside me' {the Queen - P} was talking to me about remote viewing. She was 'showing/sharing' with me various things and was going over how, during viewing, one got into the feel of what someone present at a target was feeling/thinking/etc.

I wasn't clear on the share. She went into it and 'showed/shared' me, the situation, and said, how would you feel in that situation, how does this make you feel? And I 'felt' as my communication, my response. She shared, then that is what you would perceive as how the person at the target felt. I realized she meant that I would not really be perceiving the target, but rather how-it'd-be-if-I-were-in-the-target-situation.

I asked, are you saying that I must cease all feeling/response to things in order to clearly get what the target individual is experiencing? And she 'shared' no, it was that I needed to understand and know what my *own* feeling/response was, so that I could "recognize" that as my own, and so be able to set it aside from the more subtle energy (to me) of what someone else was feeling about it.


Journal Fragment, February 2006

A collection of 'insights' while I was just sitting around and Dor was visiting my attention.

Aspect RV can be done using Tarot symbols as Aspects. Even Oliphant could do that. Any way of dividing the world up can be used like this. (Never thought of that.)

The heavens are their own tarot, their own chess set. There is a reason they play so strongly in early man's lore. Iapetus, for example, if this is a cultural name for a heavenly body, this can also be used as a valid "Aspect" for anything Aspects are called on for. (Never thought of that either.)

Shakespeare's work is so enduring, because he unconsciously modeled existing archetypes, and people subconsciously recognize these, and these carry power.

(Humor: Dor thinks "The Astrology Diet" might sell. Reminds me of L's calendar idea "Cats Gone Wild" lol.)

The patterns of a universe show its meaning. Patterns in this case are apparent size, space, relationships, orbits and cycles.

Every molecule is like a mini-universe. The Galileo temperature gauge (fluid filled spheres floating in liquid) is an abstract analogy of this concept.

DNA is a form of technology in one framework. Our species is not using it except at incredibly rudimentary levels.

When I say 'Ry is my universe' it has analogy to something literal. We have our own cycles and relationship. We have a certain orbit. Those cycles if we tracked them would make it clear: Sometimes we are closer or farther away from each other. Sometimes one seems to 'block the sun' (occult into darkness) the other. Sometimes the proximity of a certain cyclical pattern point causes turbulence in one or both. What we call relationships are really orbits.

Planet X in history is like a lover that shakes up earth and then moves out of her life. This is a powerful archetype for humans to work with.

The Inorganics love TV. They encourage us toward it. We are psychic-emotional batteries with this. We are motionless, mostly expressionless, much energy generated inside us which we are not pulling through or utilizing and it has nowhere to go. As a result, we easily succumb to the lure of inorganics in dreams and daydreams where we expend that energy, just like a person expends money at a store. Because this energy does need dealing with in some fashion, it is very subtly rewarding for the human to release it as well. This can become a habit feeding cycle if allowed.

Wow. Thanks Dor.

(I hadn't realized that inorganics are behind a lot of the urge and fascination to fall into daydreams, especially those with emotions (esp those negative). Now that's something to think about, sheesh. I guess it makes sense. There is no difference in dreams and waking except our perspective. The dynamics don't change.)

PJ

Aspect RV ( Remote Viewing )

Back around early Fall of 1998 -- holy cow! Ten years ago exactly -- when I was still very ignorant about RV (that is to say, I was a walking encyclopedia about what the expert selling training in the field taught, which is nothing like my models and understanding of things now...) I had a rather unusual experience.

I was in the middle of an RV session when I momentarily 'spaced out' and then suddenly realized that I could hear/feel a whole big group of people talking, arguing together -- inside me. They were all me. All part of me.

This came as other "spontaneous psi" tends to come to me -- a certain category of it, anyway -- where I realize that I am seeing or hearing something but
(a) somewhat after it's already been going on, and
(b) it is not really coming through my eyes/ears though I interpret it that way, and
(c) although I call it 'seeing' or 'hearing' there is actually a lot of other kinds of information coming through, a more wholistic 'understanding', than the physical sense would have. Much like in a dream, I may know past, future, relationships, situations, 'potentials', and more, related to what I'm perceiving.

In pure astonishment, I observed this group. It was a large group of people, all separate identities, and yet I understood that they were all "part of what makes up the energy I think of as me". (I wonder, while writing this, if this is like the consortium, and maybe other groupings-of-self as well.) They were having a debate.

The debate was about a piece of data -- of energy -- for my RV session. They were debating "who got to give it to me." There was the understanding that whomever gave it to me, there was some other things involved. They were 'touching my attention' and so were getting some energy from me when that happened. They were 'expressing through me' and so were getting to express/vent some of their own energy. There was a huge sense of "political competition" between them in vying for this. We were all part of the "larger entity".

I clearly sensed male and female all over. One man was insisting that he should do it because he is usually the one who does it and I expect that. Another man was insisting that no, HE should do it because he is far more expert on this particular kind of energy (of the target data). A woman was emotionally insisting -- sounding very upset -- that she should get to do it because she almost never got to do anything with me and she really needed to. I had the clear understanding at that moment that if she were the one to give me the energy, it would be completely wrong in my world. Her "need to express" means her "translation" of that energy and her "presentation" of that energy would come through to me hugely affected by--carrying--that emotional energy that she so needed to communicate and express. I realized that I definitely did not want her giving me RV data, but also, that this was some part of myself that (in ordinary life) I unfairly ignore, repress, etc. It occurred to me that when we say things like, "... and I got to express a part of me that really needed an outlet when I took up painting" or whatever, that this might be far more literal than we realize.

The experience ended. I was baffled, and I thought about this for quite awhile. I did not attribute this to session data -- I did not doubt it -- I felt implicitly this was something real and merely an 'insight' into a degree of 'internal affairs' that I had never had before.

On thinking one night, later, about how it was like social-politics, my brain made an association: Jane Roberts had a book called "PSYCHIC POLITICS." I didn't remember if I'd read it or what it was about but certainly the Seth work touched on "Aspects" and that's what this felt like.

I hunted it down and sat down to read. It amounted to the same concept/theory. That we think of ourselves as a single entity but really we are an enormously complex, "conglomerate" blend of identities operating under a single face/body/focus. That our "surface personality" is a custom and varying %/ratio of various individual identity/focuses, ever-shifting, but with common patterns. And that those inner identities work with each other -- just like people do -- and a great deal of social politics and competition and so on was involved.

I had another experience or two with the 'perception' of the 'psychic politics' inside me, later. I might have had more, but I was so emotionally enraged about the remote viewing field and my experiences with people at that point, that I really couldn't view; even thinking of the term "RV" made my stomach hurt and made me angry and dark. So I didn't explore this much during the era when I seemed most likely to perceive that dynamic.

Many years later, I came up with an approach during RV that I called "Aspect RV." My theory was that first, if there were some aspects better qualified than others to be the ones handing me the data, I wanted to call those. But since they apparently specialized in different kinds of energy, then I wanted to call the one appropriate. But if I was doubleblind, I didn't know. So instead, I would call to parts of me -- custom created by some mix of identity-energies for my call, I was sure -- and ask it what it thought or got from the target, and then go to another. So for example, I would ask the architect, priest, CEO, songwriter, mother, policeman, rock star, etc. and it was just fascinating. It did seem to be the case that if the target were a building or 'construction' for example, that I'd be more likely to get data from an aspect geared to that. But they wouldn't give me emotional, conceptual stuff, so I'd ask for a different aspect for that. Since I knew the framework of what I was asking for, I could compare the data of say, a songwriter and architect, policeman and priest, and consider that data 'from the vantage point of' that kind of energy.

Eventually I opened it more and would say, "who volunteers to give me info?" and I would get a lot of "hands in the air" sense. I would pick one, and insist that they give me a name or I would give them a name based on how I sensed their energy -- that way, in the future, if I wanted to ask for this particular blend of aspect-energy, I could do so. (This usually came out to some silly name, like 'people-girl' or 'bouncy-blue'.) Then I would get data from them. On feedback, I would know how well they had done (or not).

So if they wanted my attention again in the future, they needed to be as accurate-for-my-reality in their presentation of that to me as possible.

You might say that I used remote viewing to introduce a "free market" to my inner conglomerate. :-) Now there was competition with market-driven result!

Eventually I realized that my aspect requests could be anything. I could request the aspects best for that target (though my results with that were not as good as I hoped frankly), or I could request MY aspect of 'abraham lincoln' and get energy about the target "through that perspective". If I sensed a target related to war or military, I could ask for "my aspect of General MacArthur" or whatever, trusting that this unique combination of energies inside me would be well suited to describing the target. (You might ask, how those inner energies know what combination to provide to best mirror MacArthur? 'Cause everything IS and they're psychic, of course! ;-))

"How" I got info seemed to depend on the aspect. For example, many of them would "act out" energy like charades, while another might give me a visual or conceptual of something. I gradually came to suspect that this was a matter of what they could provide directly based on their own energetic pattern. When they couldn't, I got charades, or analogies. When they could, I would actually see or hear or experience the target in some fashion. And some might be able to get something like say, kinesthetics, but not some other aspect. I had one aspect that I called black-humor-me that felt distinctly... alien. It was fascinating yet deeply disturbing. When I got data from that source, I felt specifically not-human. I thought of humans as "other".

I started seriously wondering if the seemingly random nature of the type of data I get and the way it comes through -- both total variables -- were actually due to the combination of the target detail and the aspect of me that was bringing this through to me. In other words, that even if the target energy or pattern or whatever was clear in me at some very core point, that the process of getting it "through my body and to my mind" seemed to be going "through" a whole group of aspects, all of whom competed to be the one to that have that communication with the surface-me and that expression of their own energy as part of it. The variety of the aspects combined with the variety of elements in a target, resulted in the process -- what data came, or didn't, how it came, whether it connected to other data, etc. -- seeming to be bewilderingly random, on my surface.

But it wasn't really random, I realized; it was merely uncontrolled. This made me laugh, because the term 'controlled' remote viewing is actually a descriptive phrase that applies to the session process (it's also used as a method-label, but in english terms it is more than that). But it definitely has never been used to relate to "controlling the myriad identities inside you that translate information for you", and the theory itself is about as far-out as they come I suppose.

I've talked about this (Aspect RV) off and on over the last six years online. I've experimented with it off and on. I have had very good results with it, but it's one of those subjects that is actually so complex that I feel like I'd need to experiment for the next century to really have a clue what's going on.

I have resisted it fiercely in cycles because I struggle to "keep things simple" in RV, which in many respects is just so important -- that things be as 'clean' as possible. Usually when someone has a theory about almost anything, it is just adding complexity that makes things less clear not more. But no matter what my intellectual self thought about it, the experience of "being a conglomerate of identities" happens -- in a thousand different ways actually -- regardless.

I had an epiphany today. But it relates to Aspect RV and Archetype RV and Archetype Meditations and so I have to document those things first as edu, and THEN talk about this morning's insight.

.